Anti-Establishment Quiz 7

WAR

So, a much-feted Jewish gentleman was the Prime Minister of Ukraine when war broke out in that country.

A war against a much bigger, and supposedly much more powerful country than Ukraine.

Putin deserves to be condemned utterly for invading Ukraine and making war upon its people, but don't you think that those who stoked up the fires of war, and then chose to prosecute it, the EU, the USA, Victoria Nuland, wife of top Neocon, Robert Kagan et al., with all its predictable casualties, rather than doing everything possible to avert it, deserve to be condemned as well?

* Here's what Wikipedia has to say about Victoria Nuland:

"From 1993 to 1996, during Bill Clinton's presidency, Nuland was chief of staff to deputy secretary of state Strobe Talbott before moving on to serve as deputy director for former Soviet Union affairs.[12]

From 2003 to 2005, Nuland served as the principal deputy foreign policy adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney, exercising an influential role during the Iraq War.[citation needed] From 2005 to 2008, during President George W. Bush's second term, Nuland served as U.S. ambassador to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in Brussels, where she concentrated on mobilizing European support for the NATO intervention in Afghanistan.

In the summer of 2011, Nuland became special envoy for Conventional Armed Forces in Europe and then became State Department spokesperson.

In May 2013, Nuland was nominated to act as assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs and was sworn in on September 18, 2013. In her role as assistant secretary, she managed diplomatic relations with fifty countries in Europe and Eurasia, as well as with NATO, the European Union and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.

During the Maidan Uprising in Ukraine, Nuland made appearances supporting the Maidan protesters.[18] In December 2013, she said in a speech to the US–Ukraine Foundation that the U.S. had spent about $5 billion on democracy-building programs in Ukraine since 1991. The Russian government seized on this statement, claiming it was evidence the U.S. was orchestrating a revolution.

On February 4, 2014, a recording of a phone call between Nuland and U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt, on January 28, 2014, was published on YouTube. Nuland and Pyatt were discussing who they thought should or shouldn't be in the next Ukrainian government and giving their opinion of various Ukrainian political figures. Nuland told Pyatt that Arseniy Yatsenyuk ('Some sources state he was born to a family of ethnic Romanian-Jewish-Ukrainians' - Wiki) would be the best candidate to become the next Prime Minister of Ukraine. 

Nuland suggested the United Nations, rather than European Union, should be involved in a political solution, adding, "fuck the EU"...

Nuland was the lead U.S. point person for Ukraine's Revolution of Dignity, establishing loan guarantees to Ukraine, including a $1 billion loan guarantee in 2014, and the provisions of non-lethal assistance to ,the Ukrainian military and border guard.[29][30] Along with Secretary of State John Kerry and Secretary of Defense Ash Carter, she is seen as a leading supporter of defensive weapons delivery to Ukraine."

So, do you think you know your history?

You don't. The bad guys have got you believing a lot of things that aren't true. You see, if anything reflects badly upon them, they feel it necessary to have their bought politicians and media sweep it under the carpet, or, if any embarrassing info does manage to engage the public's attention, then the whistleblower who let it loose will be thoroughly traduced, discredited and, ideally, cancelled altogether.

Many of you will not believe the information contained in this section. Many more will not WANT to believe it. However, whatever you wish to think, it's true.

Answers beneath the questions.

Question 1 - In his various media appearances, which top military man admitted his country had "carried out hundreds of raids in Syria" and "supplied weapons to Syrian rebels." 

A. General Sir Mark-Carleton-Smith, Chief of the Defence Staff (UK)
B. General Joseph Duford, Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff (USA)
C. Gadi Eizenkot, Chief of Staff of the Defence Force (Israel)
D. General François Lecointre, Chief of the Defence Staff (France)

Question 2 - On 16 November 2009 Peter Oborne's documentary, 'Inside Britain Israel Lobby,' was broadcast. 

During the programme Sir Richard Dalton, a former UK Ambassador, had this to say:

"What's unique about the pro-Israeli lobbies is that they have such good access to politicians, they often operate behind the scenes and they have primary regard, even though they may come from Britain, not to the interests of the British people... But the interests of another country!"

Which TV company produced the documentary?

A. The BBC

B. ITN

C. Channel 4

D. Sky

Question 3 - For which organisation was the journalist, Steve Bradshaw, working when he said this in a 2003 documentary?

“This is a story about people who want the world run their way... People who believe American power is there to be used… They call themselves Neoconservatives, right wing thinkers whose dreams of a new American century have become George Bush's foreign policy… Some leading Neocons, people whisper, are strongly pro-Zionist and want to topple regimes in the Middle East to help Israel!"

A. The BBC
B. Fox News
C. Channel 4
D. Sky

Question 4 - On 8 June 1967, Israel attacked a ship of which country's fleet in the Mediterranean Sea (in international waters) north of the Sinai Peninsula, killing 34 and wounding 171?

A. Egypt

B. Syria

C. France

D. USA

Question 5 - On 12 April 1946, who said this of the 9 April 1948 massacre of more than a hundred peaceful, non-combatant Palestinians by Jewish terrorists, in the village of Deir Yassin?

"This barbarous aggression was a proof of savagery. It was a crime that added to a long list of atrocities committed by the Zionists to this day, and for which we cannot find sufficient words of revulsion."

A. King Farouk in the Egyptian Senate

B. The Secretary of State for the Colonies in the House of Commons

C. The Secretary General of the Arab League at the United Nations

D. King Abdallah of Jordan in the Raghadan Palace

Question 6 - On 22 July 1946, the King David Hotel in Jerusalem was bombed by members of the Jewish terrorist gang, the Irgun, and more than 90 people were killed as a result, many of whom were British.

Who penned the following order immediately after the bombing?

"The Jewish community of Palestine cannot be absolved from responsibility for the long series of outrages culminating in the blowing up of a large part of the Government offices in the King David Hotel causing grievous loss of life. Without the support, active or passive, of the general Jewish public the terrorist gangs who actually carried out these criminal acts would soon be unearthed, and in this measure the Jews in this country are accomplices and bear a share of the guilt.

I am determined that they shall suffer punishment and be made aware of the contempt and loathing with which we regard their conduct. We must not allow ourselves to be deceived by the hypocritical sympathy shown by their leaders and representative bodies, or by their protests that they are in no way responsible for these acts… I have decided that with effect on receipt of this letter you will put out of bounds to all ranks all Jewish establishments, restaurants, shops, and private dwellings… They... will be punishing the Jews in a way the race dislikes as much as any, by striking at their pockets and showing our contempt of them." 

A. Ernest Bevin, Foreign Secretary of the UK

B. General Bernard Montgomery, Chief of the General Staff

C. General Evelyn Barker, the Officer in Command in Palestine

D. Winston Churchill, former Prime Minister

Question 7 - Who said this on 11 September 1941, 8 weeks before the USA declared war on Germany?

"Instead of agitating for war the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way, for they will be among the first to feel its consequences... No person of honesty and vision can look on their pro-war policy here today without seeing the dangers involved in such a policy both for us and for them.... The greatest danger to this country lies in their ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government."

A. Charles Lindbergh, first man to fly the Atlantic solo
B. Paul Robeson, actor, renowned singer and political activist
C. Jesse Owens, Olympic athlete
D. Henry Ford, founder of the Ford Motor Company

Question 8 - Who said this in Berlin on 30 January 1939?

"It is a shameful spectacle to see how the whole democratic world is oozing sympathy for the poor tormented Jewish people, but remains hard-hearted and obdurate when it comes to helping them, which is surely, in view of its attitude, an obvious duty...

In accordance with their own declarations they cannot find a single reason to excuse themselves for refusing to receive this most valuable race in their own countries. Nor can I see a reason why the members of this race should be imposed upon the German nation, while in the States, which are so enthusiastic about these 'splendid people,' their settlement should suddenly be refused with every imaginable excuse."

A. Joseph Goebbels

B. Adolf Hitler

C. Rudolph Hess

D. Hermann Göring

Question 9 - Who was quoted thus by Spanish newspaper, El Defensor de Córdoba, on 24 July 1936?

"We strive to form a single national front against the Judeo-Masonic lodges, against Moscow and the Marxist societies."

A. Francisco Franco

B. Adolf Hitler

C. Benito Mussolini

D. Oswald Mosley

Question 10 - On 17 September 1936, who was quoted thus by The Daily Express?

"I have now seen the famous German leader and also something of the great change he has effected. Whatever one may think of his methods, and they are certainly not those of a parliamentary country, there can be no doubt that he has achieved a marvellous transformation...

There is for the first time since the war a general sense of security. The people are more cheerful. There is a greater sense of general gaiety of spirit throughout the land. It is a happier Germany."

A. Foreign Secretary, Anthony Eden

B. Former Prime Minister, David Lloyd George

C. Prime Minister, Stanley Baldwin

D. Chancellor of the Exchequer, Neville Chamberlain

Question 11 - In a 2006 essay titled Stalin's Jews, who described the first head of the NKVD, Genrikh Yagoda, thus:

"An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name 'Genrikh Yagoda,' the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU's deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin's collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system."

A. An Israeli journalist

B. A British historian

C. A French holocaust denier

D. The leader of the Ku Klux Klan

Question 12 - On 24 March 1933, which newspaper treated its readership to this headline, six-and-a-half years before the outbreak of WWII?

"JUDEA DECLARES WAR ON GERMANY!"

A. The Völkischer Beobachter (Nazi Party newspaper)

B. Il Popolo D'Italia (Mussolini's newspaper}

C. Action (Newspaper of the British Union of Fascists)

D. The Daily Express

Question 13 - In its 'Prominent Russians' feature, which media outlet told us this:

"Lazar Kaganovich was a Soviet statesman and Stalin’s right hand man at one point, but was later expelled from the Communist Party by Khrushchev...

In 1925, Kaganovich was sent to his homeland to head the Ukrainian Central Committee of the Communist Party. He was a rather harsh leader, choosing extremely violent means of bringing the population under the Communist rule.

His methods included the collectivization of private farms, the expropriation of wheat, and the ruthless arrests of the kulaks. This led to what is known as Holodomor in Ukraine - the massive starvation of millions of people (up to some 7 MILLION BY SOME ESTIMATES), which the current Ukrainian government has ruled genocide."

A. The BBC

B. The Jerusalem Post

C. Russia Today

D. CN News (France)

Question 14 - In his 1925 book, Practical Idealism, who says this?

"The man of the future will be mixed-race... The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future... will replace the diversity of peoples... Russian Bolshevism constitutes a decisive step towards this purpose, where a small group of Communist spiritual aristocrats govern the country…

From the European quantity-people… the mass, two quality races rise up: blood aristocracy and  the Jews… Both of them stick to their belief in their higher mission, of their better blood… In both of these… lies the core of the European nobility of the future…

Modern Jewry surpasses all other peoples in percentage of important men… with Trotsky as the frontrunner of modern politics… The prominent position held by the Jews these days is owed to their spiritual supremacy…

Modern anti-Semitism is one of the many reactionary phenomena of the mediocre against the supreme."

A. Austrian aristocrat, Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi

B. Russian Communist, Leon Trotsky

C. British politician, Winston Churchill

D. British economist and philosopher, John Maynard Keynes

Question 15 -  In the 8 February 1920 Sunday Herald article, 

'Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People,' this was said:

"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, (Lenin's grandfather was Jewish) The majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders."

Who wrote it? 

A. Philosopher and pacifist, Bertrand Russell

B. Prime Minister, David Lloyd George

C. Secretary of State for War, Winston Churchill

D. Ambulance driver during WW1, Ernest Hemingway

Question 16 - Who was quoted thus by the 3 July 1922 edition of The Chicago Tribune?

"A Jew cannot be a true patriot. He is something different, like a bad insect. He must be kept apart, out of a place where he can do mischief - even by pogroms, if necessary. 

The Jews are responsible for Bolshevism in Rússia, and Germany too. I was far too indulgent with them during my reign, and I bitterly regret the favors I showed to prominent Jewish bankers."

A. Prince Gyorgy Lvov - First Prime Minister of Republican Russia

B. Wilhelm II, Kaiser of Germany

C. Charles I, last Emperor of Austria and last King of Hungary

D. Ferdinand I, King of Bulgaria

Question 17 - On 2 November 1917, to whom did Foreign Secretary, Arthur Balfour, address the 'Balfour Declaration?' 

This said, in part:

"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people?"

A. President Woodrow Wilson

B. Secretary of State Robert Lansing

C. Edward Mandell House, President Wilson's foremost advisor during WW1

D. Lord Walter Rothschild, leader of British Zionism

Question 18 - In a speech given at the Schiller Institute in February 1994, titled, 'Palmerston launches Young Turks to permanently control Middle East,' Joseph Brewda told us this:

"In 1915, during World War I, the Kurds killed about 1 million Armenians... The Young Turks, who had been put in power by the British, used the Kurds to slaughter the Armenians... While in power, the Young Turks ran several newspapers, including 'The Young Turk,' whose editor was none other than the Russian Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky...

Jabotinsky later created the most anti-Arab of all the Zionist organizations."

Which 'anti-Arab' organisation did Jabotinsky 'later create?'

A. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of America

B. The terrorist group, Irgun

C.  The World Confederation of United Zionists

D. The World Zionist Organisation

Question 19 - During the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-05, who 'extended a critical series of loans to the Empire of Japan, in the amount of $200 million?' 

"Japan won the war, thanks in large part to the purchase of munitions made possible by (this) loan."

A. Wall Street banker, Jacob Schiff

B. The British government

C. Business magnate, John D. Rockefeller

D. Kaiser Wilhelm II

Question 20 - In June 1899, who said this?

"If the Jews were out of the question it would be easy enough to come to an agreement but they are apparently intent upon plunging the country into civil strife."

A. Suffragette, Emmeline Pankhurst

B. Prime Minister, the Marquess of Salisbury

C. Poet and novelist, Rudyard Kipling

D. Boer War General, Sir William Butler 

ANSWERS

Question 1 - C  IDF chief finally acknowledges that Israel supplied weapons to Syrian rebels! (January 2019)

"In his media appearances, Gadi Eisenkot acknowledged that the IDF carried out hundreds of raids in Syria — in some interviews, the number given is 200, in others its 400 — and dropped 2,000 bombs on Iranian targets in 2018 alone...

'We carried out thousands of attacks [in recent years] without taking responsibility and without asking for credit,' the army chief told the Sunday Times." 

Former Qaeda leader in Syria ‘welcomes’ Israeli airstrikes (February 2018) 

Syrian army claims to find Israeli-made weapons in IS hideouts (October 2017) 

UN Report: Israel in Regular Contact with Syrian Rebels including ISIS (December 2014)

"A report submitted to the United Nations Security Council by UN observers in the Golan Heights over the past 18 months shows that Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) have been in regular contact with Syrian rebels, including Islamic State (ISIS) militants. Reports by UN observers in the Golan Heights over the past 18 months reveal the type and extent of cooperation between Israel and Syrian opposition figures. 

The reports, submitted to the 15 members of the UN Security Council and available on the UN’s website, detail regular contacts held on the border between IDF officers and soldiers and Syrian rebels." 

Question 2 - C  During the programme, David Cameron, leader of the Conservative Party, was quoted thus:

"If I become Prime Minister, Israel has a friend who will never turn his back on Israel!"

 

In a programme note before the programme was aired, Oborne wrote:

“I was shocked to see that Cameron made no reference at all to the invasion of Gaza, the massive destruction it caused, or the 1,370 deaths that had resulted. Indeed, Cameron went out of his way to praise Israel because it 'strives to protect innocent life'. I found it impossible to reconcile the remarks made by the young Conservative leader with the numerous reports of human rights abuses in Gaza… To allow this terrible subject to pass by without comment suggested a failure of common humanity and decency on the part of a man most people regard as the next Prime Minister.

To praise Israel at the same time for protecting human life showed not merely A FUNDAMENTAL FAILURE OF RESPECT FOR THE TRUTH but also it gives the perception, rightly or wrongly, of SUPPORT FOR THE WRETCHED EVENTS WHICH TOOK PLACE IN GAZA…

TO OVERLOOK ISRAEL’S CULPABILITY IS UNDOUBTEDLY PARTISAN.” 

Ben Bradshaw, Gordon Brown's Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport said this:

“I’m afraid the BBC has to stand up to the Israeli authorities occasionally. Israel has a long record of bullying the BBC!"

Outside of the documentary, he added:

“I’m afraid the BBC has been cowed by this relentless and persistent pressure from the Israeli government and they should stand up against it".

David Goldberg, Rabbi Emeritus of the Liberal Jewish Synagogue, said:

“In the occupied territories, Israel is an apartheid state. There is no two ways about it. When settlers travel on one road and Palestinians have to use another road; when settlers are governed by Israeli law and Palestinians are governed by military law, you are talking about apartheid."

Alan Rusbridger, editor of The Guardian, said:

“I think it would be a terribly dangerous thing if the British press were made to feel that they couldn't criticise Israel because they were going to be held up as anti-Semites. I think it's a very disreputable argument.”

After one occasion where The Guardian was critical of Israel, convicted fraudster, Gerald Ronson, (served a year in prison for the part he played in the Guinness scandal) founding Chairman of the Jewish Community Security Trust, paid Guardian editor, Alan Rusbridger, a visit.

Rusbridger tells us Ronson said this:

"I've always said that opinions are like arseholes, everyone's got one. I'm in favour of free speech but there is a line which can't be crossed and, as far as I'm concerned, you've crossed it and you must stop this!"

Peter Oborne said this during the course of his documentary:

"So, how does the lobby work? Money plays a big part. MILLIONS OF POUNDS IN DONATIONS FROM BUSINESSMEN AND OTHERS INTO THE BANK ACCOUNTS OF POLITICIANS AND POLITICAL PARTIES... The Conservative Friends of Israel is one of Westminster's most active lobbying groups. IT CLAIMS AS ITS MEMBERS 80 PER CENT OF ALL CONSERVATIVE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT...

Aside from raising cash some of the pro-Israel lobbies in parliament also pay for and arrange trips to Israel. They have sent almost as many MPs and candidates on trips to Israel as have been made by all politicians to the United States and Europe combined over the last eight years.

Two years ago the CFI took 20 parliamentary candidates to Israel. When they got back 10 of them received donations totalling £30,000 from CFI sponsors."

Sir Richard Dalton commented upon such 'donations' thusly:

"I DON'T BELIEVE, AND I DON'T THINK ANYBODY ELSE WOULD BELIEVE, THAT THESE CONTRIBUTIONS COME WITH NO STRINGS ATTACHED."

When Hezbollah killed two Israeli soldiers and captured two more in 2006, Israel invaded the Lebanon.

During this invasion, as Oborne tells us:

"1000 Lebanese civilians were killed and an estimated 3.6 billion dollars worth of the Lebanese economy was destroyed."

He continued:

"On July 20 (William) Haig made a speech. In it he called the Israeli response ‘disproportionate‘, moderate enough you might think but LORD KALMS, A LEADING CFI DONOR, WHO OWNS DIXONS AND WAS TREASURER OF THE PARTY, WAS OUTRAGED AND THREATENED TO WITHDRAW FUNDING TO THE PARTY."

Lord Kalms wrote this response:

“William Haig's usual good sense has deserted him. Think again William. For whom do you speak? Your comments are not merely unhelpful, they are downright dangerous.”

No further donations were received by William Haig from CFI board members.

Michael Ancram, former Charman of the Conservative Party, then said:

"I knew Stanley Kalms when I was Chairman of the Party and he was one of those who took the view that ANY CRITICISM OF ISRAEL is effectively damaging to the Israeli state."

Sir Richard Dalton added:

"THE ISRAELI LOBBIES APPEARED TO CENSOR BRITISH POLITICIANS from saying that elements of the Israeli reaction was ‘disproportionate’ and THEY APPEARED TO BE WILLING TO USE FINANCIAL PRESSURES AS A WAY OF ENFORCING THAT DECISION."

Oborne continued:

"After William Haig's speech, THE DIRECTOR OF THE CFI, STUART POLAK, HAD A MEETING WITH DAVID CAMERON AT WHICH IT WAS UNDERSTOOD TERMS LIKE ‘DISPROPORTIONATE’ ARE NOT THE SORT THAT CONSERVATIVES SHOULD USE TO DESCRIBE ISRAELI MILITARY ACTION...

We've been reliably informed that donations from all CFI members and their businesses add up to well over £10 million over the last eight years. That's more than any other lobby in Westminster.

IT WAS UNDER TONY BLAIR THAT THE ISRAEL LOBBY FIRST ACQUIRED REAL INFLUENCE IN GOVERNMENT.

Former Chairman of the Labour Friends of Israel, John Mendelssohn, boasted:

‘ZIONISM IS PERVASIVE IN NEW LABOUR. IT'S AUTOMATIC THAT BLAIR WILL COME TO LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL MEETINGS'.

Today Mendelssohn is Labour's chief fundraiser and Labour Friend's of Israel have sent even more MPs to Israel than has the CFI!"

In the introductory note to Oborne's documentary, this is said:

"The Conservative Friends of Israel was founded in 1974 by the Conservative MP Michael Fidler. (Jewish) Since then it has emerged as a powerful lobby group. By 1984, the CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER, MARGARET THATCHER, HAD BEEN PREVAILED ON TO BECOME CHAIRMAN OF THE CFI BRANCH AT HER LOCAL FINCHLEY CONSTITUENCY".

As is this:

"The LFI (Labour Friends of Israel) was founded in 1957 at a public rally at that year’s Labour Party Conference... It has very close ties with the Israeli Labour Party...

One of Tony Blair’s first acts on becoming an MP in 1983 was TO JOIN THE LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL. He remained close to the group throughout his career, regularly appearing at their events".

Oborne continues:

"Shortly before Blair became party leader in 1994, he met Michael Levy the pop music millionaire at a social event arranged by the Israeli embassy. They became friends, playing tennis together and Levy became Blair's chief fundraiser. It's estimated that he raised over £15 MILLION FOR LABOUR before the row over CASH-FOR-PEERAGES.

When Tony Blair became Prime Minster in 1997, HE AWARDED MICHAEL LEVY A LIFE PEERAGE AND MADE HIM HIS SPECIAL ENVOY TO THE MIDDLE EAST. But, because Lord Levy was unpaid and working directly to the Prime Minister, WHAT HE NEGOTIATED BETWEEN ISRAEL AND ITS ARAB NEIGHBOURS, ON BEHALF OF BRITAIN, WAS KEPT SECRET...

Oxford University Middle East specialist Expert, Avi Schlaim, believes that 'Levy's role was actually damaging to Britain.' 

Professor Schlaim added:

"SOMETHING BECAME SKEWED IN BRITISH POLITICS WHEN AN UNELECTED FRIEND OF THE PRIME MINISTER HAD SO MUCH INFLUENCE OVER BRITISH POLICY TOWARDS THE MIDDLE EAST...

There are some people in the Jewish community in Britain who listen to the news, monitor the news and are too quick to start protesting to the BBC. Their complaints are usually unjustified."

Elsewhere in the documetary, the Professor said this:

“There is a split in the Jewish community about Israel. THE LEADERS TEND TO BE BLINDLY PRO-ISRAELI. THE ISRAEL LOBBY DOES REPRESENT A NARROW RIGHT-WING AGENDA… CALLING CRITICS OF ISRAEL ‘ANTI-SEMITIC’ HAS BECOME A DELIBERATE TACTIC AMONG SOME OF ISRAEL'S MORE STRIDENT LOBBY GROUPS."

Almost all the MPs who were Labour and Conservative Friends of Israel at the time voted to make war upon Afghanistan and Iraq. The documentary may be seen here

Eleven and a half years after the invasion of Iraq, patience with the Jewish lobby was wearing thin.

On 13 October 2014, British MPs voted 274 to 12 to recognise the State of Palestine.

Lib Dem MP, David Ward, said this during the debate:

"Israel is in breach of the contract set out in the Balfour declaration stating that 'nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine.'

In the light of the Nakba and everything since, that seems like a sick joke...

This Sunday at Eden Camp in north Yorkshire there will be a gathering of the Palestine veterans... they are all over the age of 80. They went to that land in 1945 as a peacekeeping force, but lost over 700 members of the armed forces and 200 police. I believe that we owe it to them for tonight’s motion to succeed... Many were veterans of Arnhem, Normandy and Bergen-Belsen. Many felt, and still feel, betrayed by Israel and question the sacrifice that so many of their colleagues made."

The (912) dead Britons were not killed by Palestinians. They were not killed by Arabs. Almost all were killed by Jews.

Sir Richard Ottaway, Tory MP for Croydon South and a long-time leading light of the Conservative Friends of Israel, said this during the debate:

“I was a friend of Israel long before I became a Tory. My wife’s family were instrumental in the creation of the Jewish state. Indeed, some of them were with Weizmann at the Paris conference…

I have stood by Israel through thick and thin, through the good years and the bad. I have sat down with Ministers and senior Israeli politicians and urged peaceful negotiations and a proportionate response to prevarication and I thought that they were listening.

But I realise now, in truth, looking back over the past 20 years, that Israel has been slowly drifting away from world public opinion. The annexation of the 950 acres of the west bank just a few months ago has outraged me more than anything else in my political life, mainly because it makes me look a fool, and that is something that I resent…

Under normal circumstances, I would oppose the motion tonight; but such is my anger over Israel’s behaviour in recent months that I will not oppose the motion. I have to say to the Government of Israel that if they are losing people like me, they will be losing a lot of people.”

Indeed they will.

People are waking up to the reality of Jewish power the whole world over. 

In Palestine, they’ve known about it at the sharp end since the nineteenth century. The Jewish problem, the negative effect that Jewish ethnocentrism tends to have upon the countries and peoples that offer the Jew sanctuary, was openly discussed back then.

However, from the 1920s onwards the intellectual elites in the West began cosying up to Marx, Trotsky and the destructive ideas of the Frankfurt School and now political correctness, of which dread philosophy non-criticism of minorities, particularly the Jewish minority, is a major component, has progressively taken a hold of our world.

This, together with the unlimited funds available to the Jewish lobby through their control of the banking system has ensured the eternal compliance of the ‘Friends of Israel’ in Westminster.

Until now.

Our politicians, of course, have always been aware of the ‘reality of Jewish power.’ We, however, have not. We may have felt it, sensed it, had it damage us at the sharp end, but we have been taught, via the media brainwash and the race laws, to keep unfashionable opinion deep inside, for fear of reprisal from the always vigilant guardians of PC thought, speech and behaviour.

By 2023, despite what was said and voted upon in the mother of parliaments nine years earlier, nothing much had changed in Israel. The powers-that-be in that country still treat the Palestinians as they always have. The Palestinians continue to endure.

"The Government of Israel... will be losing a lot of people,” said the Zionist MP.

The 2014 debate may be perused here

Question 3 - A  During the course of the 18 May 2003 Panorama documentary, 'The War Party,' Emmy-winning journalist, Steve Bradshaw, (@SteveBradJourno) said:

“They call themselves Neoconservatives, right wing thinkers whose dreams of a new American century have become George Bush's foreign policy… They believe America's military might should promote America's ideals... Will America's super hawks drag us into more wars against their enemies?"

Here are some of the things the Neocons are seen to say:

“I think the war is just. I think America is going to win. I think... the whole West is going to benefit.” (David Frum was the speechwriter who coined the phrase 'Axis of Evil')

Got that wrong, Dave.

"Iran, Iraq, Syria and Saudi Arabia are the big four and then there's Libya... We are a warlike people and that we love war… We're going to have to bring down a series of regimes who are the sponsors of a network of various terrorist organisations and Iraq is part of it...

I believe that if the tyrants are removed that there'll be a great deal more peace and chances for peace in the Middle East." (Michael Ledeen)

Got that wrong, Mick.

“The President of the United States, on issue after issue, has reflected the thinking of Neoconservatives…When we have the ability to stop totalitarian regimes we should do so… For those of us who are involved in foreign and defence policy today, my generation, the defining moment of our history was certainly the Holocaust…

I think Tony Blair's moral sense is very much reflected in the thinking of many Neoconservatives… His sense that it was right to liberate Iraq is the sense of Neo-conservatives, and was not the view of most foreign offices including probably his own.” (Richard Perle)

Iraq was liberated? I think lots of Iraqis might disagree with you there, Dick. Those that are still alive, that is.

“George Bush's current foreign policy is basically a Neoconservative foreign policy... Saddam Hussein is there and he's a dictator and he has weapons of mass destruction and are you going to do something about it or not. And, in so far as Tony Blair's answer was 'yes,' even if the rest of the US Security Council doesn't agree with us, I think Tony Blair is a kind of Neoconservative despite himself...

I think we need to… work to remove other dictators with weapons of mass destruction and deal with the threat of terrorism around the world…

I think the President and the military and our leadership will need the support of all of us... as we continue to make this world a safer and a better, and a freer place." (William Kristol)

'Weapons of mass destruction?' 'A safer and better place?' Got it wrong, didn't you, Bill? Way, way wrong. The Middle East is a basket case now and its problems are transferring themselves to Europe. All because of you and your happy, little gang of bloodthirsty psychopaths.

And the odd bought-and-paid-for President and Prime Minister.

“Virtually all Neoconservatives come out of the left… as I myself did. I grew up in the civil rights movement fighting against discrimination and segregation… and I think it also gives us a certain flair for the ideological battle… We're very unabashed about using American force... We want to take on our opponents.” (Joshua Muravchik)

Thanks for the heads up, Josh. And, hey! We get the bit about using American force. Putting young, American lives on the line for your ambitions was never going to be much of a concern down your way, was it? But taking on one's opponents? YOU fancy taking THEM on? Up close and personal? Come now, you know as well as I do that taking on one's opponents when they could put a bullet through your skull is not, never has been and never will be, a Chickenhawk thing.

Steve Bradshaw put this question to Professor Eliot Cohen, 'one of America's top military historians' and 'an adviser to the Pentagon:'

"You've expressed some concern over the idea that this is all a conspiracy whipped up by a group of 'neo-conservative hawks' somehow allied to Israel... Explain what you're concerned about."

Cohen replied:

"Sometimes the word Neoconservative is used when what they really would like to say is 'Jew'… As a Jew I find it offensive… I find it deeply, deeply offensive and untrue… it contains a very old anti-Semitic canard which is that the Jews… have these occult powers and are pulling the strings of the naïve and duped non-Jews.”

So, the fact that the Neocons who pushed the USA into a war that with an Iraq that did NOT have WMD and was, in fact, no danger at all to the West, Israel or any of its neighbours, were ALL Zionists and MOSTLY Jewish, must never be mentioned?

We can't point the finger at the bad guys because a mass-murdering Jewish psycho or two might find it 'deeply offensive?' Eliot, my dear chap, the words 'off' and 'f***' come straight to mind. And if you find that offensive, please f*** off twice.

As regards the facts of the matter, Meyrav Wurmser, another leading Neocon (who happens to be Israeli) was not as touchy as Cohen.

"Yes, many of us are Jewish," she admitted. "There is no need to apologise for that. Most of us, ALL OF US in fact, are pro-Israel... We see a tremendous similarity between Israel and America."

At one point, Steve Bradshaw put this question to Jim Lobe, a 'veteran Neocon watcher:'

"I was sitting in a bar in Capital Hill and I was told by congressional staff: ‘Careful how you use the word 'Neoconservative'. People might think you're being anti-Semitic. Can you just explain this for me?"

"It's not secret," replied Jim. "The majority of Neoconservatives have been and remain Jewish, that is a fact."

And the BBC was daring to reveal these things this in May 2003!

Think they'd do so now? And pigs might fly.

QUESTION: Which would you be more offended by:

1) The invasion and progressive devastation of the Middle East, the slaughter of many of its inhabitants and the massive refugee problems that have followed?

2) An anti-Semitic tweet?

Meyrav Wurmser added:

“You have a story here about ideas, and LOVE among people… It's real fundamental love and POWER because some of those ideas make policy... and we function and we view ourselves as a group, and we will all stand for each other in defence of each other all the way... 

We are not claiming to be RUNNING THE WORLD. Our job is just to think, and if ideas get adopted, and if ideas turn into policy – wonderful."

On day 22 of the war, when images of Saddam's statue being toppled were flashed across the world, Wurmser exulted thus:

"We actually opened a bottle of champagne. This was a moment we waited for, for many, many years. I mean WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON FREEDOM FOR IRAQ FOR THE LAST NINE YEARS, maybe. My personal feeling was doing AN INCREDIBLY GOOD DEED BY PUSHING THIS WAR because, you know… people got their freedom out of it.”

Got that wrong, didn't you, love?

And millions of Iraqis, Libyans and Syrians have paid the price.

Anyway, ladies and gents, twenty years ago, when a psychopathic Neocon cabal were were supremely confident that their imperial ambitions were going to work out perfectly, some of them were happy to admit to stuff you are not now supposed to repeat. 

In case you hurt their feelings.

In 'The War Party,' Steve Bradshaw also mentions Neocons: Douglas Feith, David Wurmser (Meyrav's husband) and top man, Paul Wolfowitz.

All three are Jewish, as are Meyrav Wurmser, Eliot Cohen, Richard Perle, Michael Ledeen, William Kristol, Joshua Muravchik, David Frum and the majority of the leading Neocons.

And the BBC was daring to reveal these things this in May 2003! Think they'd do so now?

Panorama's 'The War Party' may be viewed here

Here's something an honest Jewish journalist said in a leading Israeli newspaper just after the March 2003 invasion of Iraq:

Check it out here

Question 4 - D  The Israeli Air Force and Navy simultaneously attacked the USS Liberty during the Six-Day War. 

Both the Israeli and US governments determined that the attack was a mistake due to Israeli confusion about the ship's identity. The survivors of the attack, however, are adamant that the attack was deliberate.

Question 5 - B  Arthur Creech-Jones, the Secretary of State for the Colonies, spoke thus.

In their 1999 history, 'The Saga of Deir Yassin,' Daniel A. Mcgowan and Matthew C. Hogan tell us this:

"On the night of the attack… the leader of the Irgun (Menchem Begin, future Prime Minister of Israel) consciously exaggerated the death toll to 254 in a public statement that has become the source of the most commonly reported figure by all sides. Such willingness to make a tragedy appear worse indicates the result was desired and that the fight was not gruesome enough for them…

A member of the Jewish paramilitary youth organization commented that the attackers appeared proud of what they had done as they carried the bodies about…

The guerrillas reveal no regrets or guilt but rather indifference and even pride about the carnage that included women and children… From the beginning, THEIR BEHAVIOR REFLECTS A CONSISTENT THEME OF PROFOUND SATISFACTION WITH THE GRISLY SLAUGHTER. ONE OF THEIR FIRST OBSERVED ACTIONS AFTER THE FIGHTING WAS TO SIT DOWN AMONG THE CORPSES . . . AND HAVE LUNCH… THE LACK OF SORROW OR REVULSION AMONG THE GUERRILLAS AT DEIR YASSIN IN THE FACE OF A RARE WAR HORROR, and the apparent pride of the killers, even to a ghoulish degree, argue definitively that the carnage was not an unintended misfortune but the grisly aftermath of a deliberate massacre."

On 10 April 1948, 'The New York Times' reported thus:

"It was an act of violence that was proposed and discussed in advance. The guerrillas' lack of restraint after meeting resistance caused many to follow through on plans to murder regardless of instructions to inhibit them. Their leaders proved unwilling or unable to stop them. Afterwards, they proved quite willing to benefit from the fear effect and embellish the bloody outcome. That evening, Irgun chief Raanan met with the international press in a tea-and-cookies party in Givat Shaul and told them that 254 Arabs had been killed."

On 9 April 1982, Zvi Anlori, the commander of the Haganah unit that controlled Deir Yassin after the massacre, said this in the Hebrew daily, Davar:

"I went into six to seven houses. I saw cut off genitalia and women's crushed stomachs. According to the shooting signs on the bodies, it was direct murder."

In 'The Life and Times of Menachem Begin,' by Amos Perlmutter, Ben-Zion Cohen, the Irgun commander for the Deir Yassin operation, informed the Jabotinsky Archives thus:

"We eliminated every Arab that came our way… The majority was for liquidation of all the men in the village and any other force that opposed us, whether it be old people, women, or children."

In his book, 'The War of Independence: Out of Crisis Came Decision,' Uri Milstein said:

"I told the reporters that 254 were killed so that a big figure would be published, and so that the Arabs would panic not only in Jerusalem but across the country, and this goal was accomplished."

General Richard Catling, a British Army Assistant Inspector, said this in 'The Palestinian Catastrophe,' by Michael Palumbo:

"There is no doubt that many sexual atrocities were committed by the attacking Jews. Many young girls were raped and later slaughtered. Old women were also molested."

On 21 July 2008, UK Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, said this to the Israeli Knesset:

"To be able to come here at the invitation of your Speaker and of your Prime Minister Olmert - and to applaud you and the citizens of Israel for the courage you have shown in the face of adversity, resolution in the face of conflict, resilience in the face of challenge - is, for me, a singular honour indeed. Everyday you meet in this Knesset you live out the hopes - the promises - of centuries...

I am especially pleased - as the first British Prime Minister to address the Knesset - to congratulate you at this sixtieth anniversary on THE ACHIEVEMENT OF 1948: the centuries of exile ended, the age-long dream realised, the ancient promise redeemed - the promise that even amidst suffering, you will find your way home to the fields and shorelines where your ancestors walked."

Hey, Gordon! 

You know the 700,000+ that fled Israeli atrocity 60 years ago? Would you call that an 'achievement of 1948?' It was ever so simple really. You just slaughter a peaceful, non-combatant village full of Arabs and, hey presto, the rest will disappear as if by magic!

The essay, 'What about Deir Yassin, Gordon?' can be seen here 

You may also wish to take a look at what the Israeli daily, Haaretz, has to say about Deir Yassin, in the article, 'Testimonies From the Censored Deir Yassin Massacre'

Question 6 - C  General Barker was actually in the King David Hotel when the bomb went off and, outraged, wrote the order to his troops (which he would come to regret) soon afterwards.

On 27 April 1947, Barker expressed his contempt for the Jews in a letter to his former lover, Katie Antonius:

"Yes I loathe the lot - whether they be Zionists or not. Why should we be afraid of saying we hate them. Its time this damned race knew what we think of them - loathsome people".

Wikipedia tells us this: 

"Barker was the target of several assassination efforts, which included explosive devices placed around his Palestinian residence. The future President of Israel, Ezer Weizman, was one of Barker's several attempted assassins."

 

Israel seems to prefer its elite politicians to have a murderous streak. 

Future Prime Minister, Menachem Begin, was the leader of the Irgun when the King David Hotel was bombed.

On 6 November 1944, The Minister Resident for the Middle East, Lord Moyne, (Walter Guinness) was murdered in Cairo by the Stern Gang. 

His chauffeur was also killed.

On 17 September 1948, Count Folke Bernadotte, the United Nations Mediator in Palestine, was also murdered by the Stern Gang. 

Colonel André Serot was shot dead alongside him.

Yitzhak Shamir was the leader of the Stern Gang when both these events took place.

He too would become President of Israel.

On 22 May 2003, The article Jewish Groups plotted to kill Bevin, appeared in The Telegraph.

This said:

"Jewish terrorist groups plotted to assassinate Ernest Bevin, the Foreign Secretary in the post-war Labour government, as part of a bombing campaign on the British mainland inspired by the IRA.

MI5 warned Clement Attlee, the Prime Minister, that the Stern Gang and Irgun intended to establish five terrorist cells in London to mount a bombing campaign aimed at driving Britain out of Palestine. Bevin, who was opposed to the creation of the state of Israel, was a prime target.

Security Service files also contain details of an outlandish plan by the followers of an American Zionist rabbi to bomb London from the air. Details of that plot have been heavily censored.

The warnings came in 1946 from James Robertson, head of the Security Service's Middle East Section. He wrote: 

'Our Jerusalem representative has received information that the Irgun and Stern groups have decided to send five cells to London to work on IRA lines. To use their own words, the terrorists intend to 'beat the dog in his own kennel'.

The Stern group has been steadily recruiting in recent months and may now number 600 followers, most of whom are desperate men and women who count their own lives cheap.

In recent months it has been reported that they have been training selected members for the purpose of assassinating a prominent British personality. Special reference has been several times made to Mr Bevin.'

The plot to bomb the capital from the air was said to be the product of followers of one Rabbi Korff."

Of the United Nations plan to partition Palestine, Ernie Bevin once commented: 

"The majority proposal is so manifestly unjust to the Arabs that it is difficult to see how, in Sir Alexander Cadogan's words, 'we could reconcile it with our conscience'." 

I wonder what Ernie would have made of the dreadful Israel-coddling sycophants who came after him?

Not a lot, be my guess.

Question 7 - A  As one might have imagined, Lindbergh’s speech was universally condemned by the mainstream media and the political establishment. Roosevelt said nothing but the White House press secretary left no doubt about what he thought, indicating a 'similarity' between the content of Lindbergh's speech and 'the outpourings of Berlin in the last few days.'

Lindbergh's wife, Anne, was, likewise, unimpressed and said:

“I would prefer to see this country at war than shaken by violent anti-Semitism."

Anne preferred to see over 400,000 young Americans die than have her husband voicing a truthful, if rarely stated, opinion?

Interesting.

Lindbergh, himself, wrote this in his diary:

"I felt I had worded my Des Moines address carefully and moderately. It seems that almost anything can be discussed today in America except the Jewish problem. The very mention of the word 'Jew' is cause for a storm. Personally, I feel that the only hope for a moderate solution lies in an open and frank discussion."

Question 8 - B  Adolf Hitler spoke thus on that occasion:

"It is a shameful spectacle to see how the whole democratic world is oozing sympathy for the poor tormented Jewish people, but remains hard-hearted and obdurate when it comes to helping them which is surely, in view of its attitude, an obvious duty...

The German nation does not wish its interests to be determined and controlled by any foreign nation... We are resolved to prevent the settlement in our country of a strange people which was capable of snatching for itself all the leading positions in the land... It is our will to educate our own nation for these leading positions. We have hundreds of thousands of very intelligent children of peasants and of the working classes. We shall have them educated... We wish that, one day, they, and not the representatives of an alien race, may hold the leading positions in the State together with our educated classes. 

German culture... is German and not Jewish, and therefore its management and care will be entrusted to members of our own nation. If the rest of the world cries out... against this barbaric expulsion from Germany of such an irreplaceable and culturally eminently valuable element... how thankful they must be that we are releasing these precious apostles of culture, and placing them at the disposal of the rest of the world. 

In accordance with their own declarations they cannot find a single reason to excuse themselves for refusing to receive this most valuable race in their own countries. Nor can I see a reason why the members of this race should be imposed upon the German nation, while in the States, which are so enthusiastic about these 'splendid people,' their settlement should suddenly be refused with every imaginable excuse. I think that the sooner this problem is solved the better; for Europe cannot settle down until the Jewish question is cleared up."

Much of the speech may be accessed here

Here are some of the things concerning this period in our history you never learned in school...

Question 9 - A  The Franco quote can also be found in 'Francisco Franco : The Times and the Man,' by Joaquin Arraras, p. 159 - 1938.

The victorious General of the Spanish Civil War (1936 - 1939), who became Spain's dictator in 1939 and remained so until his death in 1975, also said these things at various times:

"Be under no illusion. The Jewish spirit, which was responsible for the alliance of large-scale capital with Marxism and was the driving force behind so many anti-Spanish revolutionary agreements, will not be got rid of in a day." (Victory speech in Madrid - 19 May 1939)

"We have torn up Marxist materialism and we have disorientated Masonry. We have thwarted the Satanic machinations of the clandestine Masonic superstate, despite its control of the world’s press and numerous international politicians." (Speech to the women’s section of the Falange in Madrid - 11 September 1945)

"The whole secret of the campaigns unleashed against Spain can be explained in two words: Masonry and Communism." (14 December 1946) 

Question 10 - B  In the 17 September 1936 edition of The Daily Express, former Prime Minister, David Lloyd George, said this:

“I have now seen the famous German leader and also something of the great change he has effected. Whatever one may think of his methods – and they are certainly not those of a parliamentary country – there can be no doubt that he has achieved a marvellous transformation in the spirit of the people, in their attitude towards each other, and in their social and economic outlook.

He rightly claimed at Nuremberg that in four years his movement had made a new Germany. It is not the Germany of the first decade that followed the war – broken, dejected and bowed down with a sense of apprehension and impotence. It is now full of hope and confidence, and of a renewed sense of determination to lead its own life without interference from any influence outside its own frontiers.

There is for the first time since the war a general sense of security. The people are more cheerful. There is a greater sense of general gaiety of spirit throughout the land. It is a happier Germany. I saw it everywhere, and Englishmen I met during my trip and who knew Germany well were very impressed with the change.

One man has accomplished this miracle. He is a born leader of men. A magnetic and dynamic personality with a single-minded purpose, as resolute will and a dauntless heart. He is not merely in name but in fact the national Leader. He has made them safe against potential enemies by whom they were surrounded.

He is also securing them against the constant dread of starvation which is one of the most poignant memories of the last years of the War and the first years of the Peace. Over 700,000 died of sheer hunger in those dark years. You can still see the effect in the physique of those who were born into that bleak world.

The fact that Hitler has rescued his country from the fear of a repetition of that period of despair, penury and humiliation has given him an unchallenged authority in modern Germany.

As to his popularity, especially among the youth of Germany, there can be no manner of doubt. The old trust him; the young idolise him. It is not the admiration accorded to a popular leader. It is the worship of a national hero who has saved his country from utter despondency and degradation.

To those who have actually seen and sensed the way Hitler reigns over the heart and mind of Germany, this description may appear extravagant. All the same, it is the bare truth. This great people will work better, sacrifice more, and, if necessary, fight with greater resolution because Hitler asks the to do so. Those who do not comprehend this central fact cannot judge the present possibilities of modern Germany.

That impression more than anything I witnessed during my short visit to the new Germany. There was a revivalist atmosphere. It had an extraordinary effect in unifying the nation. Catholic and Protestant, Prussian and Bavarian, employer and workman, rich and poor, have been consolidated into one people. Religious, provincial and class origins no longer divide the nation. There is a passion for unity born of dire necessity.

I have never met a happier people than the Germans and Hitler is one of the greatest men.”

Which is all a bit different to the routine anti-Nazi, Hitler-is-the-epitome-of-all-evil propaganda we've been spoon-fed for the last seventy eight years, isn't it?

I'm not saying Nazism wasn't responsible for many terrible things, it was, but there are two sides to every story and, when you only ever get told the one, you're liable to head off down the one way street those who would have you know only half the story want you to head down.

The Lloyd-George speech may be accessed here

Question 11 - A  In his 21 December 2006 essay for Ynet News, Sever Plocker, told us this:

"We mustn't forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish. Almost 90 years ago, between the 19th and 20th of December 1917, in the midst of the Bolshevik revolution and civil war, Lenin signed a decree calling for the establishment of The All-Russian Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution and Sabotage, also known as Cheka.

Within a short period of time, Cheka became the largest and cruelest state security organization. Its organizational structure was changed every few years, as were its names: From Cheka to GPU, later to NKVD, and later to KGB.

We cannot know with certainty the number of deaths Cheka was responsible for in its various manifestations, but the number is surely at least 20 million, including victims of the forced collectivization, the hunger, large purges, expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass death at Gulags.

Whole population strata were eliminated: Independent farmers, ethnic minorities, members of the bourgeoisie, senior officers, intellectuals, artists, labor movement activists, "opposition members" who were defined completely randomly, and countless members of the Communist party itself.

In his new, highly praised book 'The War of the World,' Historian Niall Ferguson writes that no revolution in the history of mankind devoured its children with the same unrestrained appetite as did the Soviet revolution. In his book on the Stalinist purges, Tel Aviv University's Dr. Igal Halfin writes that Stalinist violence was unique in that it was directed internally.

Lenin, Stalin, and their successors could not have carried out their deeds without wide-scale cooperation of disciplined "terror officials," cruel interrogators, snitches, executioners, guards, judges, perverts, and many bleeding hearts who were members of the progressive Western Left and were deceived by the Soviet regime of horror and even provided it with a kosher certificate.

All these things are well-known to some extent or another, even though the former Soviet Union's archives have not yet been fully opened to the public. But who knows about this? Within Russia itself, very few people have been brought to justice for their crimes in the NKVD's and KGB's service.

The Russian public discourse today completely ignores the question of 'How could it have happened to us? As opposed to Eastern European nations, the Russians did not settle the score with their Stalinist past.

And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name 'Genrikh Yagoda,' the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU's deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin's collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system.

After Stalin no longer viewed him favorably, Yagoda was demoted and executed, and was replaced as chief hangman in 1936 by Yezhov, the 'bloodthirsty dwarf.'

Yezhov was not Jewish but was blessed with an active Jewish wife. In his Book Stalin: Court of the Red Star, Jewish historian, Sebag Montefiore, writes that during the darkest period of terror, when the Communist killing machine worked in full force, Stalin was surrounded by beautiful, young Jewish women.

Stalin's close associates and loyalists included member of the Central Committee and Politburo Lazar Kaganovich. Montefiore characterizes him as the first Stalinist and adds that those starving to death in Ukraine, an unparalleled tragedy in the history of human kind aside from the Nazi horrors and Mao's terror in China, did not move Kaganovich.

Many Jews sold their soul to the devil of the Communist revolution and have blood on their hands for eternity. We'll mention just one more: Leonid Reichman, head of the NKVD's special department and the organization's chief interrogator, who was a particularly cruel sadist.

In 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5 percent of those holding the most senior posts in the Soviet security apparatuses were of Jewish origin. They too, of course, were gradually eliminated in the next purges.

In a fascinating lecture at a Tel Aviv University convention this week, Dr. Halfin described the waves of soviet terror as a 'carnival of mass murder'... Turns out that Jews too, when they become captivated by messianic ideology, can become great murderers, among the greatest known by modern history.

The Jews active in official communist terror apparatuses (In the Soviet Union and abroad) and who at times led them, did not do this, obviously, as Jews, but rather, as Stalinists, communists, and Soviet people. Therefore, we find it easy to ignore their origin and 'play dumb'. What do we have to do with them? But let's not forget them.

My own view is different. I find it unacceptable that a person will be considered a member of the Jewish people when he does great things, but not considered part of our people when he does amazingly despicable things.

Even if we deny it, we cannot escape the Jewishness of 'our hangmen,' who served the Red Terror with loyalty and dedication from its establishment."

They didn't teach you that in school, now did they?

Ynet is one of the major Israeli news websites and is the online outlet for the Yedioth Ahronot newspaper.

Question 12 - D.  Confirmation here

The 'Focus Group,' which did much to channel Winston Churchill's pro-war energies in the direction that those whose actions prompted The Daily Express headline wished them to go, is mentioned in this Wikipedia article.

For information on Churchill's debts, obligations and his primary benefactor before and during WWII, Henry Strakosch, check out The Daily Mail article, Winston the spendaholic: He teetered on the brink of bankruptcy and was saved by secret backhanders!

Robert Waley-Cohen, the head of the Focus Group, and Henry Strakosch were both Jewish.

Question 13 - C  The Ukrainian 'genocide', which claimed the lives of around '7 million' people and almost no one in the western world knows about, took place, for the most part, in 1933, six years before WWII and the 'Holocaust' began.

Stalin's brother-in-law, Lazar Kaganovich, the chief architect of this 'genocide,' was Jewish.

Question 14 - A.  Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, the founder of the first European Union (the Pan-European Union), also said this in Practischer Idealismus:

"As a people the Jews experience the eternal struggle of quantity against quality, inferior groups against high quality individuals, inferior majorities against superior minorities.”

Coudenhove-Kalergi was, himself, mixed-race. 

His father was an Austro-Hungarian aristocrat, his mother was the daughter of a Japanese oil tycoon.

In his 1966 memoir, Ein Leben Fur Europa, he said:

"At the beginning of 1924, we received a call from Baron Louis de Rothschild. One of his friends, Max Warburg… had read my book… and wanted to get to know us.

To my great surprise, Warburg spontaneously offered us 60,000 gold marks... Max Warburg… had a principle of financing these movements…

He arranged his 1925 trip to the United States to introduce me to Paul Warburg and financier Bernard Baruch."

The businessman and banker, Bernard Baruch, was the intimate advisor and confidant of no less than four American presidents.

Max Warburg was the director of the family’s banking house in Hamburg from 1910 until 1938, when he left Germany for America. As head of the firm, he had been an adviser to Kaiser Wilhelm prior to and during World War One.

Paul Warburg, the brother of Felix and Max, was the man most responsible for the creation, in 1913, of the Federal Reserve. In ‘Warburg, the Revolutionist,' Harold Kellock told us this in the May 1915 issue of Century Magazine:

"Paul M. Warburg is probably the mildest-mannered man that ever personally conducted a revolution… He stepped forth armed simply with an idea and he conquered… He imposed his idea on a nation of a hundred million people…

Warburg does not look like a… revolutionist but he’s played that role for nearly seven years…

The passage of the Federal Reserve Act… made his revolutionary ideas the law of the land. There is no doubt that without Mr. Warburg there would have been no Federal Reserve Act.”

On 17 February 1950, addressing the US Senate, Franklin D. Roosevelt’s top financial adviser, James Warburg, said this:

"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent."

James Warburg was Paul Warburg’s son.

The melting pot endeavours of Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi on behalf of ‘Communist spiritual aristocrats’ and the ‘quality races’ of ‘aristocracy and the Jews’ were rewarded when, in 1950, he became the first recipient of the Charlemagne Prize.

Other winners of the prize that bears the first Holy Roman Emperor's name have included Edward Heath; Bill Clinton; Henry Kissinger, Jean-Claude Juncker, Angela Merkel, Donald Tusk, Herman Van Rompuy, Emmanuel Macron and Tony Blair.

You know, globalists on speed.

Bernard Baruch and the Warburgs were Jewish.

Question 15 - C.  The essay was written by Secretary for War, Winston Churchill.
 

Here's a little more:

"Some people like Jews and some do not; but no thoughtful man can doubt the fact that they are beyond all question the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has ever appeared in the world. And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent...

As bankers and industrialists they have strenuously promoted the development of Russia’s economic resources... In politics their support has been given, for the most part, to liberal and pro-gressive movements... In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish efforts rise the schemes of the international Jews...

This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (USA), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.

It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, A definite recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire.

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, THE MAJORITY OF THE LEADING FIGURES ARE JEWS. MOREOVER, THE PRINCIPAL INSPIRATION AND DRIVING POWER COMES FROM THE JEWISH LEADERS...

In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary commissions for combating counter revolution has been take by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses.

The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (Spartacist Revolt) ... Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing."

Fourteen months earlier, the 12 April 1919 edition of The Times quoted from a speech made by Churchill at the Connaught rooms in London:

"Of all the tyrannies in history, the Bolshevist tyranny is the worst, the most destructive, and the most degrading. It is sheer humbug to pretend that it is not far worse than German militarism. [The atrocities are] incomparably more hideous, on a larger scale, and more numerous than any for which the Kaiser is responsible."

Question 16 - B  The Chicago Tribune added:

"He (the Kaiser) was much disturbed by the strong Jewish-Masonic influence in France, and thought that this was at the bottom of much that went wrong...

The Jewish influence among the Young Turks worries him and he fears that Bolshevist elements are becoming too powerful among them."

Question 17 - D  The Balfour Declaration was contained in a letter from Foreign Secretary, Arthur Balfour, to Lord Walter Rothschild.

It announced support for the establishment of a 'national home for the Jewish people' in Palestine, then an Ottoman region with a small minority Jewish population. The declaration read:

"Dear Lord Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

Yours sincerely,

Arthur James Balfour"

A few months after WW1 had been won, Balfour casually dismissed the above arrangement thus:

"In Palestine we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country….The Four Great Powers are committed to Zionism. And Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age-long traditions, in present needs, in future hopes, of far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land...

In short, so far as Palestine is concerned, the Powers have made no statement of fact which is not admittedly wrong, and no declaration of policy which, at least in the letter, they have not always intended to violate." (February 1919 memo, quoted on p.73 of 'Palestine Papers, 1917 - 1922, Seeds of Conflict,' by Doreen Ingram)

Curiously, twelve years before the 'declaration', Balfour hadn't been as enamoured of Jewish 'aspirations'. In the House of Commons on 10 July 1905, he was happy to blame 'the undoubted evils that had fallen upon the country' on 'an immigration which was largely Jewish.' 

So, why would the British government promise to hand over Palestine to the Jews? Indeed, how could they, seeing as Palestine was not theirs to give away? It belonged to the Arabs who lived there and was controlled by the Turks.

In the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs of November 2005, John Cornelius explains 'The Hidden History of The Balfour Declaration' as follows:

"Herbert Asquith, who had been Prime Minister since 1908, had begun, reluctantly, to consider a negotiated peace, but negotiations with the Zionists, through Weizmann and Balfour, provided another option for Britain, although not for Asquith. That option was the possibility of a formal, but secret, alliance between the Zionists and the Monarchy, whereby the British Monarchy would undertake to facilitate the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine and THE ZIONISTS WOULD UNDERTAKE TO HELP BRING AMERICA INTO THE WAR ON THE SIDE OF THE ALLIES, thus assuring an Allied victory."

On 12 January 1999, under the heading, 'Balfour Declaration's Author Was A Secret Jew,' The Jerusalem Post presented the following article to the world:

"Leopold Amery, the author of the Balfour Declaration, the 1917 document from British foreign secretary Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild which laid the groundwork for the establishment of the State of Israel, was a secret Jew.

This has been disclosed in just-published research by William Rubinstein, professor of modern history at the University of Wales, who says Amery hid his Jewish background. Ironically, one of Amery's sons, John, achieved infamy when he defected to Nazi Germany and was hanged for treason in London after World War II. The other son, Julian, succeeded his father as a member of Parliament and was a staunch supporter of Israel…

In his 1955 autobiography, Amery, who was assistant secretary to the British war cabinet in 1917, said his own father, Charles Frederick Amery, came from an old English family. His mother, Elisabeth Leitner Amery, he wrote, was part of a stream of Hungarian exiles who fled first to Constantinople and then to England.

According to Rubinstein's research, Amery's mother was born to Jewish parents in 1841 and was named Elisabeth Joanna Saphir. The family lived in Pest, which later became part of Budapest and contained the city's first Jewish quarter.Both of her parents were Jewish, says Rubinstein, who adds that Amery himself changed his middle name from Moritz to Maurice in an attempt to disguise its origins.

As assistant secretary to the war cabinet, Amery not only drafted the Balfour Declaration, but also was responsible for establishing the Jewish Legion, the first organized Jewish fighting force since Roman times, which proved to be the forerunner of the modern Israel Defense Forces.

Later, as secretary of state for dominion affairs from 1925 to 1929, he spearheaded what many regard as the most impressive period of peaceful growth in pre-state Palestine. But his most significant contribution to British politics was a powerful speech in parliament which is thought to have played a key role in precipitating the departure of prime minister… Chamberlain in 1940 and the accession to power of Winston Churchill…

Rubinstein, whose disclosures are contained in the February edition of History Today, describes Amery's deception as ‘possibly the most remarkable example of concealment of identity in 20th century British political history.’

Rubinstein, who suspects that both of Amery's sons knew of their Jewish origins, believes Leopold Amery decided to conceal his own Jewishness… because of the obstacles it might have posed at the time to his political ambitions".

The above article can no longer be accessed at The Jerusalem Post. The Jewish Virtual Library site, however, confirms its authenticity here

Check out 'Amery's Little Secret' here

Question 18 - B  Jabotinsky created the Irgun.

In the same speech, Joseph Brewda tells us more about the Young Turks and their Jewish roots:

"In 1915, during World War I, the Kurds killed about 1 million Armenians... The Young Turks, who had been put in power by the British, used the Kurds to slaughter the Armenians. The British then used this genocide as a justification for trying to eliminate Turkey...

The founder of the Young Turks was an Italian, B'nai B'rith official named Emmanuel Carasso... Carasso was also the grand master of an Italian masonic lodge there, called 'Macedonia Resurrected.' The lodge was the headquarters of the Young Turks, and all the top Young Turk leadership were members...

While in power, the Young Turks ran several newspapers, including 'The Young Turk,' whose editor was none other than the Russian Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky...

The paper... was funded by the Russian Zionist federation, and managed by B'nai B'rith. The editorial policy of the paper was overseen by a Dutch Zionist named Jacob Kann, who was the personal banker of the king and queen of the Netherlands.

Jabotinsky later created the most anti-Arab of all the Zionist organizations, the Irgun."

Wikipedia tells us this:

"B'nai B'rith... is committed to the security and continuity of the Jewish people and the State of Israel and combating antisemitism and other forms of bigotry." 

In his 1929 history, 'Inner Folds of the Ottoman Revolution,' Mevlan Zadeh Rifat wrote:

“The Armenian genocide was decided in August 1910 and October 1911 by a Young Turk committee composed entirely of displaced Balkan Jews in the format of a syncretist Jewish-Muslim sect which included Tala’at, Enver, Behaeddin Shakir, Jemal and Nizam posing as Muslims. 

It met in the Rothschild-funded Grand Orient lodge/hotel of Salonika." 

In his 2016 history, 'The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Chistians,' Christopher Jon Bjerknes tells us this:

"In 1905, Jewish leaders calling themselves "Young Turks" met in Masonic lodges in Salonika, Italy, Paris and Vienna. They plotted a coup d'etat against the Sultan of Turkey Abdul Hamid II. Jews and crypto-Jewish Doenmeh of the Committee for Union and Progress took over complete control of the Turkish Empire in 1909. 

They had several goals. Their primary objective was to establish a segregated Jewish State in Palestine. They also sought to instigate World War I, to slaughter entire Christian populations, and to destroy the Turkish Empire and supplant Islamic religion and culture with a soulless and cultureless society engineered by Jewish positivists in Vienna, Paris, Italy and Salonika." 

Question 19 - A  Wikipedia's 'Fandom' section tells us this:

"In perhaps his most famous financial action, (Jacob) Schiff... through Kuhn, Loeb & Co., extended a critical series of loans to the Empire of Japan, in the amount of $200 million... No European nation had yet been defeated by a non-European nation in a modern, full-scale war. It is quite likely Schiff also saw this loan as a means of avenging, on behalf of the Jewish people, the anti-Semitic actions of the Tsarist regime...

This loan attracted worldwide attention and had major consequences. Japan won the war, thanks in large part to the purchase of munitions made possible by Schiff's loan...

Schiff grew to be one of American Jewry's top philanthropists and leaders, donating to nearly every major Jewish cause... As an observant Jew, Schiff supported political, secular Zionism...

Historian George Kennan noted that Schiff helped finance revolutionary propaganda during the Russo-Japanese war and revolution of 1905. The Jewish Communal Register of New York City stated that 'Mr. Schiff has always used his wealth and his influence in the best interests of his people. He financed the enemies of autocratic Russia and used his financial influence to keep Russia from the money markets of the United States'."

 

The 14 March 1917 edition of The New York Times told us that, at a Madison Square Garden rally celebrating the Russian Revolution, Jacob Schiff sent the following telegram when he could not appear in person:

"Will you say for me to those present tonight how deeply I regret my inability to celebrate with the Friends of Russian Freedom the actual reward of what we had hoped and striven for these long years!"

In his review of Joseph W. Bendersky's 2000 book 'The Jewish Threat, Enemies of My Enemy,’ Professor Kevin MacDonald says this:

“The idea that the Bolshevik Revolution was part of a coordinated conspiracy… rested on the widespread intelligence reports that wealthy Jews were important financiers of revolutionary movements… American Jewish capitalists like Jacob Schiff did finance Russian radical movements directed at overthrowing the Czar and may well have had considerable impact."

Jacob Schiff was married to Therese Loeb, daughter of Solomon Loeb, the founder of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. 

Another Loeb daughter, Nina, was married to another German Jew, Paul Warburg, the man most responsible for creating the Federal Reserve Bank, the most powerful banking house in the world.

Most Americans are unaware that the Fed Res is not an arm of government. It is, and always has been, a private banking institution.

Question 20 - D  General Sir William Butler, Commander-in-Chief of British forces in South Africa, said what he said in a letter to the War Office of June 1899, four months before the outbreak of the second Boer War. 

"If the Jews were out of the question it would be easy enough to come to an agreement but they are apparently intent upon plunging the country into civil strife...  

Indications are too evident here to allow one to doubt the existence of strong undercurrents, the movers of which are bent upon war at all costs for their own selfish ends." 

The following Butler quotations can be found on pages 5 - 8 of Ivor Benson's 1979 history, 'The Battle for South Africa.'

"We are fighting in order to place a small international oligarchy of mine-owners and speculators in power in Pretoria. Englishmen will do well to recognise that the economic and political destinies of South Africa are, and seem likely to remain, in the hands of men, most of whom are foreigners by origin, whose trade is finance and whose trade interests are not British.

This international oligarchy may be better for the country and for the world than the present or any other rule; and England may be performing a meritorious world-service in establishing it. But it is right for us to understand quite clearly what we are doing...

Indications are too evident here to allow one to doubt the existence of strong undercurrents, the movers of which are bent upon war at all costs, for their own selfish ends. It has been my aim since I came here to keep myself clear ofthis gang. They brought many of our people into their slime and grime a few years since...

No one knew better than I did all that we had suffered from false information during the preceding quarter century. It had been the root of all our past trouble. Now, all at once, I was brought face to face with this old evil, multiplied to a degree I could not have imagined possible, no longer sporadic, but systematised, gigantic, unscrupulous; powerful in means of execution; directed to one end, that end fraught with possibilities of the gravest kind".

John Atkinson Hobson, (1858-1940) was an English economist who blew the whistle on the real reasons for the 2nd Boer War. (1899-1902) 

The following Hobsonian excerpts are taken from, 'The War in South Africa.'

"We are fighting in order to place a small international oligarchy of mine-owners and speculators in power in Pretoria. Englishmen would do well to recognise that the economic and political destinies of South Africa are, and seem likely to remain, in the hands of men most of whom are foreigners by origin, whose trade is finance and whose trade interests are not British…

South Africa presents a unique example of a large press, owned, controlled and operated by a small body of men with the direct aim of bringing about a conflict which shall serve their business interests...

The small group of international financiers (are) chiefly German in origin and Jewish in race."

 In a February 1999 speech in Johannesburg's marketplace, Paul Kruger, (1825-1904) President of the Transvaal, said this a few months before the outbreak of the second Boer War.

"If it were possible to eject the Jew monopolists from this country’s neck and crop without incurring war with Great Britain, then the problem of ever lasting peace would be settled in South Africa."

Lord Kitchener was the Commander of British forces in South Africa, from 1900-1902.

In The Boer War, by T. Pakenham, Kitchener is quoted as stating that the Boers were 'afraid of getting into the hands of certain Jews who no doubt wield great influence in the country.'

Anyway, the it would seem that an exactly similar type to 'the small group of international financiers... Jewish in race' of Boer War infamy, with the financial and strategic assistance of the secretive 'Focus' group headed by Baron Robert Waley-Cohen, (See answer to question 12 above) enabled World War 2 to be prosecuted to their eventual advantage as well.

Around sixty million lives would be lost in the process.

Add up all the rest and, boy oh-boy, Mr Marx has a lot to answer for!

 

SCORE

0-2       - Did you just die?

3-4       - Did someone else just die?

5-6       - Stick a pin this person, someone!

7-8       - Tolerable - just

9-10     - Adequate

11-12   - Fair

13-14   - Goodish

15-16   - Good

17-18   - Very good!

19-20   - Excellent!

Now go to Anti-Establishment Quiz 8

What the establishment would rather you didn't know...

Top journalist, Lara Logan, speaks out on Ukraine!

Former Australian Special Forces Commander Riccardo Bosi, speaks out on Ukraine!

"Ukraine is the center of the deep state. It's the head of the snake and Vlad's taking the head off... Ukraine has been the center of the globalists for decades and decades... The CIA has been working in the Ukraine for 70 years..

Ignore all the chatter about nuclear war and Russia's attempts to take over the globe. Completely the opposite. Do your own research and stop watching the mainstream media."

“For a barrel of Adrenochrome and children’s body parts… it’s $77,000… which gets sent to Ukrainian Bioweapons Labs…all organized by the 3-letter agencies!” (CIA/FBI etc.?)

"Ukraine IS the Deep State... Washington's 'own personal money-laundering piggie bank!" 

UKRAINE: Lara Logan's truth bombs!

UKRAINE - Truth after truth! When did you hear this in the Western media?
UKRAINE: “What is it like on the front lines now?" "Horror... It's just genocide!"
How come AT-4 weapons systems, originally shipped from US to Ukraine, are ending up in Mexico?

FBI asked Twitter to censor western journalists on behalf of Ukraine!

U.S. defense contractors stand to gain billions from the ongoing war in Ukraine!

Oligarchs, bankers, NWO et al are using the war to grab Ukraine's land and resources!

Zelensky announces alliance with corporate behemoth BlackRock for reconstruction of Ukraine!

UKRAINE: Shell announces record profits of £68BILLION after energy bills skyrocket

SELLING OFF UKRAINE! Dunaisk Sea Port goes for 201 million!
No one is pushing the Ukraine War more than Victoria Nuland!
Roger Waters accuses Biden, and Nuland of engineering the War in Ukraine!

Top Rabbi calls on Jews to flee Russia before they start getting blamed for Ukraine war!

Putin 'ready for peace talks?' Ex-commander slams 'stupid stubbornness' of war strategy!
Royal Marines deployed for ‘covert’ missions in Ukraine!
HITCHENS: Arrogance and folly in Ukraine could send us hurtling towards nuclear catastrophe!
EU deletes reference to 100,000 Ukrainian losses in Von Der Leyen speech!

Posturing Sunak needs a Ukraine reality check!

U.S. Chamber of Commerce flies multiple Ukraine flags, only one American flag
Sanctions Fail: Just 8.5% of western companies have actually left Russia
After years of cuts and Ukraine donations we can field just 40 battle-ready tanks?
Ukraine replaces Defense Minister amid corruption scandal

New documents show traitor Alexander Vindman has a plan to make big bucks off Ukraine war!

After years of cuts and Ukraine donations we can field just 40 battle-ready tanks?
Ukrainian Refugees Go Back to Ukraine for medical treatment to avoid NHS
UK to send depleted uranium ammo to Ukraine! Putin says Russia will ‘respond accordingly!’
Obama/Nuland largely responsible for the Russia/Ukraine conflict today!

Russian soldier says: Children were carved up, they slaughtered them, 'they took organs!'

Russian troops uncover Ukrainian child organ-harvesting operation?

Ukraine is a corrupt regime. It's a massive money-laundering operation!
The war in Ukraine was made in Washington not Moscow!
EU Chief Von Der Leyen says Ukraine needs €600 billion to be rebuilt!

UKRAINE: Oh, what a corrupt war!

UKRAINE: Home of 'Bond villain' oligarch who got Zelensky elected raided!
Trump calls for peace in Ukraine NOW, ending the ‘entire globalist neocon establishment!’
Army 'stripped of heavy guns after defence chiefs pledged to give 30 AS90s to Ukraine!
Ex-Israeli PM says Western powers ‘blocked’ ceasefire early in Ukraine War!
Giving Ukraine Tanks ‘High Risk’ and Lines the Pockets of Arms Makers
Top Eurocrat Verhofstadt blames Brexit for Russian invasion of Ukraine!
Ukraine: Don’t write off the Russians yet!

Lt. Col. Daniel Davis Warns of Nuclear War! U.S. Has ‘No Plan’ in Ukraine!
We supply tanks, now Zelensky wants jets, submarines, long-range missiles!
UKRAINE: Senior government officials sacked/resign amid a flurry of corruption claims!
Admit Ukraine into NATO and give them more guns, Boris Johnson demands!

Russian soldier says Ukrainians were operating a 'child organ network' in Izyum!
Zelensky media shooting an 'atrocity scene' in Ukraine!
Ukrainian lawyer says shell that hit school in Donetsk was American-made!
Sunak funds Ukrainian energy independence after banning fracking in UK!
Lindsey Graham: Tanks for Ukraine! New ‘World Order is at stake!’

Ukraine replaces Defense Minister amid corruption scandal

UKRAINE: Ever wonder why the BBC et all keeps some info to itself?